In contemporary discussions, many associate Vedic culture primarily with the principle of ahimsa, or nonviolence. This perspective often leads to the belief that adherents should avoid confrontation, even when facing threats to their beliefs and practices. However, a closer examination of Vedic scriptures, particularly the Bhagavad-gita, reveals a more nuanced understanding.
The Bhagavad-gita presents the warrior Arjuna hesitating on the battlefield, reluctant to fight his kin. Lord Krishna admonishes him, emphasizing that his duty (dharma) as a warrior is to combat injustice and uphold righteousness. This narrative underscores that taking action against adharma (unrighteousness) is not only justified but essential.
Sanatana Dharma, or eternal duty, encompasses the principles that sustain the universe, promoting harmony and balance. The term dharma derives from the Sanskrit root "dhri," meaning to uphold or sustain. Thus, dharma represents both the act of sustaining and the essence of what is sustained. When society deviates from these principles, disharmony and conflict arise.
Allowing the erosion of Sanatana Dharma equates to permitting the decline of societal harmony and spiritual freedom. Inaction in the face of threats to these principles can be seen as a passive form of violence, as it enables the proliferation of injustice and ignorance. Therefore, defending dharma becomes a moral obligation.
The concept of "Intellectual Kshatriyas," introduced by scholars like David Frawley, refers to individuals who champion Sanatana Dharma through knowledge and discourse. These modern warriors engage in educating others, correcting misconceptions, and promoting the values inherent in Vedic traditions.
Defending one's beliefs and cultural practices, when done with the intent of preserving harmony and righteousness, aligns with the core tenets of Vedic philosophy. Such actions, grounded in dharma, transcend mere self-interest, aiming instead to uphold the universal order and spiritual well-being of society.